'Mixed status' Tears Apart Families
                              By 
                                Rich Pedroncelli, AP
                                 
                                Deportation split Julie Santos' family in 2001, 
                                forcing her husband, an illegal immigrant, to 
                                return to Mexico while she and their two U.S.-born 
                                children remained in her hometown of Chicago.
                              George 
                                Santos had worked and paid taxes in the USA for 
                                15 years but is barred from ever returning because 
                                he used false identity papers to claim he was 
                                a U.S. citizen.
                                "He has said, 'Continue with your life and 
                                forget about me,' but I can't," says Julie 
                                Santos, 40, a real estate agent and secretary 
                                of the Latino Family Unity Campaign. She calls 
                                often and, whenever possible, visits him in Mexico 
                                with their 10-year-old son and 8-year-old daughter.
                              About 
                                2 million families nationwide face a similarly 
                                gut-wrenching risk of deportation because the 
                                children are U.S.-born citizens but at least one 
                                parent is an illegal immigrant, according to the 
                                Pew Hispanic Center. If deported, the parent must 
                                decide whether to leave the kids with relatives 
                                in the USA or take them along.
                              Many 
                                "mixed status" families are created 
                                because the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution 
                                grants automatic citizenship to all children born 
                                in the country except those of foreign diplomats.
                              "It's 
                                a nearly absolute birthright citizen, and in that 
                                way, it's unusual. But it's not exceptional," 
                                says Peter Spiro, international law professor 
                                at the University of Georgia School of Law. 
                              He 
                                says most countries have tighter limits on citizenship, 
                                but several Western Hemisphere countries, including 
                                Canada, Mexico, Brazil and Argentina, also grant 
                                it to all children born on their land. He says 
                                other countries are adopting broader U.S.-style 
                                language.
                              As 
                                Congress returns from a two-week recess and again 
                                wrestles with the thorny issue of immigration 
                                reform, some House Republicans have proposed limiting 
                                birthright citizenship.
                              Rep. 
                                Nathan Deal, R-Ga., and 83 GOP co-sponsors are 
                                pushing a bill that would restrict automatic citizenship 
                                at birth to children of U.S. citizens and legal 
                                residents. He says he doesn't expect the measure 
                                to be included in any broader reform package this 
                                year but hopes it generates debate. 
                              Mixed-status 
                                families pose "a huge problem," says 
                                Ira Mehlman of the Federation for American Immigration 
                                Reform, which backs Deal's bill. They "complicate 
                                an already complicated issue."
                              At 
                                least 3.1 million U.S.-born children live in families 
                                headed by an illegal resident, the Pew Hispanic 
                                Center estimates. They account for two-thirds 
                                of all children of illegal immigrants.
                              Deal 
                                argues that birthright citizenship is a magnet 
                                for many illegal immigrants who use so-called 
                                "anchor babies" to establish a U.S. 
                                foothold. These U.S.-born children are eligible 
                                for government services, and at 21, can petition 
                                for their parents' residency.
                              Deal 
                                says the 14th Amendment was not intended to include 
                                these children.
                                Historians say the Amendment was ratified in 1868 
                                to ensure the citizenship of freed slaves. "There's 
                                no question" that it would have excluded 
                                children of illegal immigrants had there been 
                                many illegal workers at the time, says Peter Schuck, 
                                professor at Yale Law School and author of Citizens, 
                                Strangers and In-Betweens.
                                The amendment has been misinterpreted for more 
                                than a century, says John Eastman, director of 
                                the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence at 
                                the Claremont Institute. He argues that its authors, 
                                in granting citizenship to "all persons born 
                                or naturalized in the United States," meant 
                                only those not owing allegiance to a foreign power, 
                                not simply those born on its soil.
                              Whatever 
                                its intent, birthright citizenship has been widely 
                                accepted as applying to all children born in the 
                                USA.
                              "There 
                                are good arguments" for and against this 
                                citizenship, says Schuck. He says some illegal 
                                immigrants may take advantage of it, but "it 
                                does not lead to a multigenerational, long-term 
                                population of people who are not citizens."
                              Schuck 
                                says Germany has had big problems because it has 
                                many immigrants, particularly from Turkey, living 
                                their entire lives there who weren't voting citizens 
                                and felt alienated. As a result, he says, Germany 
                                and France have broadened their citizenship laws 
                                to include more immigrants.
                              Spiro 
                                says children of illegal immigrants will likely 
                                spend their entire lives in the USA. By depriving 
                                them of citizenship, he says, "you'd have 
                                a significant portion of the population being 
                                legally subordinated on an inter-generational 
                                basis."
                              Rep. 
                                Howard Berman, D-Calif., member of the House Judiciary 
                                Committee, says Deal's bill would create more 
                                illegal residents. "It's unconstitutional. 
                                It creates a larger underclass, and it's unenforceable," 
                                he says. "It does nothing to secure our borders." 
                                For decades, the undocumented parents in "mixed 
                                status" families have been deported. Some, 
                                citing the plight of their U.S.-born kids, have 
                                been spared.
                                Immigration judges decide whether a parent qualifies 
                                for a waiver on a "case by base basis," 
                                says Ernestine Fobbs, spokeswoman for U.S. Immigration 
                                and Customs Enforcement. In fiscal 2005, she says 
                                more than 162,000 people were deported from the 
                                USA, but it's unclear how many had U.S.-born children 
                                or spouses.
                              Waivers 
                                are "much less frequent than in the past," 
                                says John Trasvina, interim president and general 
                                counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense 
                                and Educational Fund. He says Congress has tightened 
                                the criteria since 1996, giving judges less discretion 
                                to stay a deportation. 
                              Currently, 
                                deportation can be suspended for illegal immigrants 
                                only if they have lived in the USA longer than 
                                10 years, have no criminal record and can prove 
                                their removal would cause "extremely unusual 
                                hardship" to a close relative with legal 
                                status.
                                Julie Santos says her husband, George, owned a 
                                home and worked full-time as a furniture refinisher 
                                in Chicago. She says he did not seek legal residency 
                                because he did not want to admit to his employer 
                                that he was in the country illegally.
                              They 
                                considered moving the family to Mexico, but economic 
                                conditions are too tough.
                                She tries to keep him connected to the family, 
                                but it's difficult. 
                                "Now sometimes it feels I'm talking about 
                                a ghost," Julie Santos says.
                              There 
                                are 6.6 million families in the USA in which a 
                                head of household and/or spouse is an illegal 
                                immigrant. In some of these families, the children 
                                are U.S. citizens. Number of families with:
                                No children 3.9 million
                                Children are U.S. citizens 1.5 million
                                Children are not U.S. citizens 725,000
                                Some children are citizens, some are not 460,000
                                Sources: Pew Hispanic Center and U.S. Census Bureau